The strategic parties hypothesis states that resources should be allocated to close elections, where such efforts could mean the difference between winning and losing. In what ways did the strategic parties hypothesis succeed and fail in the 2016 presidential election? Explain.

The strategic parties hypothesis states that resources should be allocated to close elections, where such efforts could mean the difference between winning and losing. In what ways did the strategic parties hypothesis succeed and fail in the 2016 presidential election? Explain.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *