What are the ethical issues involved in psychologists taking a public stance on a controversial issue? What specific General Principles apply to this issue? How do the standards in Section 5 on advertising and other public statements relate to this issue? What are some steps that a psychologist should take prior to speaking publically on a controversial issue?

After reading the Haeny (2014) article, provide a summary and analysis of the topic. Be sure to address the following in your main post:

  • What are the ethical issues involved in psychologists taking a public stance on a controversial issue?
  • What specific General Principles apply to this issue?
  • How do the standards in Section 5 on advertising and other public statements relate to this issue?
  • What are some steps that a psychologist should take prior to speaking publically on a controversial issue?
  • In your opinion, is it better for a psychologist to avoid speaking publically on a controversial issue when the psychologist’s personal views do not align with the field’s general consensus on the topic? Provide your rationale.
0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *