Effective Meetings

Assignment 2: Dropbox Assignment

Effective Meetings

In this assignment, you will study how a leader can conduct a variety of meetings effectively.

Complete the following tasks:

Part I

Based on your reading, understanding of the articles, and your experience in the meeting you attended, answer the following questions:

    • Where is the meeting being conducted, and what is its purpose? Is the meeting focused on communications or problem solving, or is it a meeting with no specific agenda?
    • Is the meeting a regularly scheduled event, such as a monthly scheduled meeting or a meeting to address a specific matter?
    • Does the meeting have a set communication designed with relevant information to advance the meeting? Please explain.
    • Was the meeting opened with an announcement or explanation of its purpose and importance?
    • What was the communication style of the meeting’s leader or facilitator?
    • What were the leader’s bases of power? Select from a number of conceptual paradigms and elaborate on your selection.
      • Authoritative
      • Knowledge and Expertise
      • Correction or Castigation
      • Reward or Incentive
      • Persuasion
      • Mentoring or Coaching
      • Relationships or Individual or group interactions
      • Direction or Vision
      • Charismatic or Personable
    • Did the members or attendees have an opportunity to express opinions? Were they asked for suggestions, ideas, and information?
    • Did you recognize any conflict, disrespect, or tension among the members or attendees? If so, was the source of the conflict evident?
    • Did you observe the participants’ body language (such as posturing, positioning, or gesturing) when different topics were introduced? Describe it.
    • What was the intended outcome of the meeting? Was it achieved? Why or why not? What were the pivotal moments of the meeting which contributed to its success or failure?

Part II

Complete the following tasks to provide an overall critique of the meeting you attended:

      • Identify the positive, effective qualities of the meeting in one list, and identify the qualities which were ineffective in a separate list.
      • Arrange each list from top to bottom, from most important to least important.
      • Take the top three ranked factors from each list and explain the affect they had on the meeting.

Part III

You need to organize a meeting to introduce a new project in a health service organization. The project is sufficiently complex in size and nature to require an expanded cross-section of expertise from within and outside the organization. You are responsible for inviting the necessary individuals and representatives of involved departments and professional functions to the meeting.

Based on the principles contained in the articles, textbook, and elected independent research provided in the course, complete the following tasks:

      • Develop an agenda for the meeting.
      • Provide information, expertise, and background on the invited attendees. Explain the rationale and intended functional expertise each attendee brings to the group.
      • Recognize and develop measurable objectives to assess the success of the planned meeting.

Compile your responses to Parts I, II, and III in a 7- to 8-page Microsoft Word document.

Support your responses with examples.

Cite any sources in APA format.

Submission Details

Name your document SU_HCM4007_W5_A2_LastName_FirstInitial.doc.

Submit your document to the W5 Assignment 2 Dropbox by Tuesday, December 20, 2016.

Assignment 2 Grading Criteria
Maximum Points
Attended an appropriate meeting and explained its purpose clearly.
20
Described the communication style of the meeting’s facilitator.
20
Justified and elaborated on the bases of power of the facilitator.
20
Analyzed, reviewed, and incorporated the concepts of the four articles in your response.
25
Summarized an overall critique of the meeting, listing all relevant points.
20
Analyzed the success or failure of the meeting, and explained the key elements of the meeting which contributed to its success or failure.
30
Developed a meeting agenda for introducing the new healthcare project.
25
Selected attendees with respect to their functional expertise and described what their contributions will be in the meeting.
20
Developed measurable criteria to assess the success of the meeting.
20
Written components.
50
Total:

Applying New Skills

As you reflect on the various tools and methods of policy analysis that have been discussed over the last several weeks, and on {Our practice at applying them to the task, how do you envision applying policy analysis in
your professional activities? How have your  views on policy analysis or on the field of public administration changed or been confirmed?

Discussion question

 

 

 

 

 

Discuss each question and give examples to explain your conclusion. If you use outside sources, please make reference to them and include the citation in your written work.

 

Why do human beings believe there is a force outside of themselves that controls life?

a-Can you prove that there is?

b- Why is the belief so strong?

c- Will humans always believe there is a superior being force?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Policy Brief

1.  Assess processes to measure equity in public policy analysis.
2.  Analyze practices of incorporating public advocacy in policymaking.
3.  Describe the application of public policy analysis tools and methods to a specific policy issue.

 

Policy Brief Guidelines:

Policy Brief
The ability to develop and present policy analysis requires not only understanding of the various facets and tools of the analytical craft, but also the ability to present the policy in a standard format (see Dunn, Appendices 1-4). This assignment will allow you to learn how to construct a policy document – a policy brief – and, in turn, present your analysis related to the policy matter under review and examination.
The policy brief can be related to, or build upon, the policy focus that you identified and explored during Units 1-7. You can choose any analytical tools that you have encountered throughout the course and your overall analysis must reference relevant peer-reviewed journals, as well as relevant analysis produced by the public or non-profit policy analysis research centers.
To successfully complete this project, you will be expected to:

1.  Describe the application of public policy analysis tools and methods to a specific policy issue.
2.  Evaluate various economic analysis models.
3.  Assess processes to measure equity in public policy analysis.
4.  Analyze practices of incorporating public advocacy in policymaking.
5.  Critique examples of public policy analysis and advocacy with evidence of citizen participation.
6.  Demonstrate an academic writing style.
To achieve a successful project experience and outcome, you are expected to meet the following requirements. To achieve a successful project experience and outcome, you are expected to meet the following requirements.

• Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message.
• APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to APA (6th Edition) style and formatting.
• Number of resources: Minimum of 15 peer-reviewed or other academically credible resources.
• Length of paper: 15-20 typed, single-spaced pages.
• Font and font size: Arial, 12 point.

 

Describes the application of public policy analysis tools and methods to a specific policy issue, and explains the rationale for the tools and methods chosen.

 

Evaluates various economic analysis models, applies them to the specific policy issue, and explains the findings they yield.

 

Applies processes to measure equity in public policy analysis and evaluates the findings they yield.

 

Applies and evaluates practices of incorporating public advocacy in policymaking.

 

Critiques examples of public policy analysis and advocacy with evidence of citizen participation, and offers recommendations or assessments of that analysis.

 

Demonstrates a superior academic writing style that is free of errors and through its clarity increases the reader’s ability to engage with the material.

Break-Even Analysis*****Already A++ Rated Tutorial Use as Guide Paper*****

Application: Break-Even Analysis

When expenses and revenues are equal, this is known as the “break-even point” or BEP. To determine break-even, an examination of fixed and variable costs (expenses) in relationship to revenues is necessary. Understanding where the BEP is for a given product or service helps managers determine how to make modifications to increase profitability.

For this Assignment, review this week’s Media, the Weekly Briefing, and the information given below.

LaTricia Jones is planning to make a unique toy that will keep small children entertained for hours! She believes that parents everywhere will want to buy her toy, and she needs to determine her costs and the number of toys she needs to sell before earning a profit.

After researching her costs, she has come to the following conclusions.

  • The rental of a small facility will be $2,200 per month, insurance $500 per month, and other fixed costs are estimated at $1,300 per month. In this facility, she will be able to produce 100 toys per month at a variable cost for each toy of $5.00. She plans to sell them for $30 each.

     

  • The rent for a larger facility will be $5,000 per month, insurance $1,000 per month, and other fixed costs are estimated at $2,580 per month. In this facility, she will be able to produce 400 toys per month at a variable cost for each toy of $4.00. She plans to also sell them for $30 each.

The Assignment:

  • Part 1: Calculate the break-even point for LaTricia Jones’ toy company under each of the two different scenarios using a spreadsheet program such as Excel. Be sure to apply the appropriate accounting process to determine the break-even points.
  • Part 2: Recommend which option, based on the scenarios for the company, that you would select using a word processing program such as Word. Support your conclusion with both a written analysis and quantitative data.

Submit your Application (both your Excel and Word files) by Day 7.

To submit your Assignment, do the following:

  • Save Part 1 of your Assignment as a “.xls” file with the filename “WK6AssgnP1+last name+first initial.xls”. Sally Ride’s filename would be “WK6AssgnP1RideS.xls”.
  • Save Part 2 of your Assignment as a ”.doc” file with the filename “WK6AssgnP2+last name+first initial.doc”. Sally Ride’s filename would be “WK6AssgnP2RideS.doc”.
  • To upload Part 1 of your Assignment, click on Assignments on the course navigation menu, and then click the Assignment Part 1 – Week 6 link.
  • To upload Part 2 of your Assignment, click on Assignments on the course navigation menu, and then click the Assignment Part 2 Turnitin – Week 6 link.

General Guidance on Application Length:

Your Application, due by Day 7, will typically be 2–3 paragraphs in length as a general expectation/estimate for each bullet point. Refer to the rubric for the Week 6 Application for grading elements and criteria. Your Instructor will use the rubric to assess your work.

 

 

 
 

YTHOMIT ONLY ALL OTHERS PLEASE DO NOT MESSAGE ME

Module 3 – Case

 

Utility Ethics

 

Assignment Overview

 

In the Module 3 Case, we will use the Utility Test to inform our understanding of the Mattel case study.

 

For purposes of the Case Assignment, we will focus on the Utility Test:

 

Hamilton, B. (2012, June 7). Utility test. Ethics Ops. Retrieved from http://ethicsops.com/UtilityTest.php

 

The Utility Test may be best understood with a review of the following examples—also from Ethics Ops. Be sure that you review both examples thoroughly, as we will be using the Utility Test in the Case assignment:

 

http://ethicsops.com/LessSugarMarketing.php

 

http://ethicsops.com/PhantomExpenses.php

 

 

 

Required Reading

 

Visit the library, and locate the following article:

 

Sethi, S., Veral, E., Shapiro, H., & Emelianova, O. (2011). Mattel, Inc.: Global manufacturing principles (GMP) – A life-cycle analysis of a company-based code of conduct in the toy industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 99(4), 483-517. Retrieved from ProQuest.

 

 

 

Case Assignment

 

In a well-written, 4- page paper, apply the Utility Test to the Mattel case study.

 

Keys to the Assignment

 

1.   Choose an ethical issue raised by the Mattel case study  (e.g., you might choose to analyze Mattel’s treatment of employees).

 

2.   Apply the Utility Test: http://ethicsops.com/UtilityTest.php

 

3.   Be sure that you follow each step of the Utility Test (use a separate section heading for discussion of each step of the test):

 

A.  Introduce the test.

 

B.  Briefly discuss why utility ethics is a valid way of deciding right and wrong.

 

C.  Apply the test

Step 1: Identify the alternative actions that are possible and the persons and groups (the stakeholders) who will be affected by these actions.

Step 2: For each of the most promising alternatives, determine the benefits and costs to each person or group affected.

Step 3: Select the action in the current situation that produces the greatest benefits over costs for all affected.

Step 4: Discuss what would happen if the action were a policy for all similar situations.

 

D.  Draw a conclusion. If the same action is selected in Steps 3 & 4, then the action is an ethical one. If different actions are selected, decide whether the individual action will produce the greatest good and the least harm, for all affected, over the long term.

 

4.   Be sure to use at least two sources from the library to support your discussion and analysis (choose sources that are not included in the Background section of Module 3).

**SECOND ASSIGNMENT**

 

Module 3 – SLP

Utility Ethics

In the Module 3 SLP, you will choose an organization with which you are familiar, and you willwrite a 2- to 3-page paper, in which you discuss the extent to which your organization embraces Corporate Social Responsibility (or CSR).

Required Reading

Read the following article, which provides examples of socially responsible companies (this website includes a number of quite excellent articles pertaining to the merits of CSR). You may also want to explore the optional readings provided below, as they may be useful to your understanding of CSR:

Fallon, N. (2014, December 4). 20 great examples of socially responsible businesses. Business News Daily. Retrieved from http://www.businessnewsdaily.com/5499-examples-socially-responsible-businesses.html

Optional Reading

The following resources provide a very good overview of CSR, and how companies use CSR initiatives to increased the organization’s effectiveness:

2014 corporate social responsibility report (2014). Hershey Company. Retrieved from http://www.thehersheycompany.com/social-responsibility/shared-goodness/goodbusiness

Corporate social responsibility. (2013). International Institute for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://www.iisd.org/business/issues/sr.aspx

Assignment

In a well-written, 2- page paper, discuss the extent to which an organization with which you are familiar pursues CSR. 

Keys to the Assignment

1.   In 1-2 paragraphs, describe your organization – what it does, how many employees, how much revenue, etc.

2.   Select some aspect of CSR, and discuss how your organization employs CSR in its operations.

3.   What are the specific advantages to your company in its use of CSR?

4.   If your company does not presently pursue a form of CSR, please identify a specific CSR practice (e.g., environmental consciousness, community welfare, etc.) from which your company would benefit.

5.   Be sure to use at least two sources from the library to support your discussion and analysis (choose sources that are not included in the Background section of this module).

6.   Follow the guidelines in The Student Guide to Writing a High Quality Academic Paper

7.   You are expected to demonstrate evidence of critical thinking – as defined in the Module 2 background materials and the grading rubric.

8.   Save your completed paper, and upload your assignment before the due date.