Maintaining Ethical Standards ( No Plagiarism)
/0 Comments/in /by adminWrite a 500-to 750-word paper identifying the ethical issue or issues.
Describe the ethical issues that confront you as the caseworker.
Describe how you are going to help resolve these issues while maintaining ethical standards.
Cite the principles or core areas you are applying from the AAMFT Code of Ethics.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.
The branch manager ofan outlet (Store I) ofa nationwide chain of pet supply stores wants to study characteristics of her customers. In particular, she decides to focus on two variables: the amount of money spent by customers and whether the customers own
/0 Comments/in /by adminQuestion 8.73
The branch manager ofan outlet (Store I) ofa nationwide
chain of pet supply stores wants to study characteristics
of her customers. In particular, she decides to focus on
two variables: the amount of money spent by customers and
whether the customers own only one dog, only one cat, or
more than one dog and/or cat. The results from a sample of
70 customers are as follows:
• Amount of money spent: X $2 1.34, S $9.22.
• 37 customers own only a dog.
• 26 eustomers own only a cat.
• 7 customers own more than one dog and/or cat.
a. Construct a 95% confidence interval estimate for the
population mean amount spent in the pet supply store.
b. Construct a 90% confidence interval estimate for the
population proportion of customers who own only a cat.
The branch manager of another outlet (Store 2) wishes to
conduct a similar survey in his store. The manager does not
have access to the information generated by the manager of
Store I. Answer the following questions:
c. What sample size is needed to have 95% confidence of
estimating the population mean amount spent in this store
to within ± $1.50 if the standard deviation is estimated to
be $10?
d. How many customers need to be selected to have 90%
confidence of estimating the population proportion of
customers who own only a cat to within ±0.045?
e. Based on your answers to (c) and (d),
ESSAY in Spanish
/0 Comments/in /by adminEnsayo Escrito: Investigación de Enfermería basada en la Evidencia
Estimados Estudiantes:
Realice una búsqueda en la biblioteca virtual o en el Internet y redacte un ensayo sobre las investigaciones de enfermería basadas en la evidencia. Compare sus hallazgos e indique que aspectos aplican a su proyecto. Venga con su ensayo a clase y esté preparado para discutir sus argumentos.
For Monday at 9:00PM
/0 Comments/in /by adminYour final project should discuss the following critical elements. Make sure you review your final project before you submit it, and make sure it discusses all the critical elements and answers the questions.
-
Patient History Analysis
-
a) Did you summarize the patient history, explaining key patient demographics and family history that could be risk factors for
common diseases?
-
b) Have you identified the past diagnosis (or diagnoses, if more than one exists in the file) and explained how the diagnosis was
made? Specifically, what tests were done?
-
c) Did you discuss the symptoms the patient showed according to the file? Did you discuss why and how these symptoms led the
doctors to order certain tests?
-
d) Did you include what alternate diagnosis (or diagnoses) these symptoms could have indicated? Did you use evidence-based
resources to support your conclusions?
-
e) Using supportive details from peer-reviewed resources, did you explain the pathophysiology of the diagnosis? In other words,
how does the diagnosed disease develop and progress in the body?
-
f) Have you identified the past prescribed medications the patient is taking and explained the purposes of their larger
pharmacological groupings?
-
g) Did you explain what symptoms the specific medications are meant to treat, using resources to support your claims about the
impact of the medication on the symptoms?
-
h) Did you illustrate how these medications impact the body and its functions? Did you include examples to support your
explanations?
-
-
Recent Visit Analysis
-
a) Did you explain why the patient has returned to the doctor’s office? Did you discuss what symptoms and signs the patient is
experiencing?
-
b) Did you analyze the new symptoms and signs to determine whether the past diagnosis is still a reasonable conclusion or could
have been a misdiagnosis? Did you use specific information from both the recent visit and the patient history to inform your analysis?
-
c) Based on the new signs, symptoms, and potential diagnosis (if the doctor has made a new diagnosis), did you discuss what new or potential treatments would be appropriate? Why?
III. Identification of Record Inaccuracies
-
a) The patient file contains several inaccuracies and inconsistencies. Using your knowledge of medical terminology, anatomy, and
physiology, did you articulate three issues you have identified?
-
b) Did you explain in detail what makes the identified issues a problem in terms of patient health and record keeping? Did you use
appropriate medical terminology, references to anatomy, and concepts of normal physiology, where appropriate?
-
c) Did you discuss the impact of the issues on the patient, the coding system, and the billing system if they had not been caught,
using the appropriate terminology?
-
d) Did you illustrate how you would work to address each issue, with specific detail regarding who you would pull into the
discussion and who would be responsible for the particular details of each issue in a real medical setting?
Peer Review Feedback
/0 Comments/in /by adminPeer Review Assignment
Due Week 6 and worth 50 points
Peer reviews should provide feedback to a peer on the criteria expected in the paper. The Week 6 Feedback Form can be downloaded from the Appendices section of the course guide by clicking the link here. Follow these instructions:
For Online Students:
- Choose a classmate’s paper from the “Easy Drop off/Pick up Zone” discussion thread in the course shell.
- Obtain the Peer Review Feedback Form from the course shell.
- Comment on all criteria, noting strengths and / or areas for improvement on the feedback form.
- Provide completed Peer Review Feedback Form by posting it to the same “Easy Drop off/Pick up Zone” discussion thread AND submitting it to the Peer Review Assignment link above.
For On-ground Students:
- Receive a classmate’s paper from your professor.
- Obtain the Peer Review Feedback Form from the course shell.
- Comment on all criteria, noting strengths and / or areas for improvement on the feedback form.
- Provide completed Peer Review Feedback Form and classmate’s paper as directed by your professor.
Note: On-ground students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor during the class meeting in which the paper is reviewed; online students should submit the feedback form and paper to the professor via the “Easy Drop off/Pick up Zone” discussion thread and Peer Review Assignment link in the course shell.
As you read a classmate’s paper, address these criteria:
- Identify the course, assignment, and date.
- Provide positive feedback, where appropriate, on the criteria.
- Identify areas for improvement, where appropriate, and recommend improvements.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
- Recognize the elements and correct use of a thesis statement.
- Recognize transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
- Identify effective sentence variety and word choice.
- Identify positive qualities and opportunities for improvement in writing samples.
- Analyze the rhetorical strategies of ethos, pathos, logos in writing samples and for incorporation into essays or presentations.
- Correct grammatical and stylistic errors consistent with Standard Written English
- Recognize how to organize ideas with transitional words, phrases, and sentences.
Click here to view the grading rubric for this assignment.
Interesting links
Here are some interesting links for you! Enjoy your stay :)Pages
Categories
- No categories
Phone: +3239551523
mycopywriter002@gmail.com